You and I might agree on that point, but the NHL does not:
By these rules, Lucic should have been given a penalty, as he was. While the principal point of contact wasn't the head, I do think because of the results he should be made an example of why you don't charge a goalie. It's one thing to check on, but it's another thing to charge into time, blasting him over, and giving him a concussion. That's two goalies this year already through unnecessary contact with the head, and something needs to be done about it. When goalies wearing ultraprotective masks are getting concussions, there's a problem.42.1 Charging
A goalkeeper is not “fair game” just because he is outside the goal crease area. The appropriate penalty should be assessed in every case where an opposing player makes unnecessary contact with a goalkeeper. However, incidental contact, at the discretion of the Referee, will be permitted when the goalkeeper is in the act of playing the puck outside his goal crease provided the attacking player has made a reasonable effort to avoid such contact.


Reply With Quote
Bookmarks